By Business Insider Reporter
As global interest in cryptocurrency grows, East African nations are taking divergent – and at times contradictory – paths in regulating digital assets, creating both confusion and opportunity for investors, innovators, and regulators across the region.
A new report by Coin World highlights the patchwork nature of crypto regulation in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda, with each country pursuing a unique legal and policy approach that is shaping how cryptocurrencies are used, taxed, and perceived.
Kenya: Legal clarity amid innovation concerns
Kenya is leading the region with its Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) Bill, designed to bring cryptocurrency exchanges, wallet providers, and traders under a formal regulatory umbrella. The bill introduces a digital asset tax – initially controversial but later halved – to generate revenue while addressing anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) concerns.
Supporters argue that the law positions Kenya as a forward-thinking financial hub, capable of attracting foreign crypto firms and investors.
However, critics warn that the regulatory requirements could raise entry barriers and stifle local innovation.
“Kenya’s approach is bold and sets a strong compliance precedent,” said crypto legal advisor Angela Mwangi. “But if not carefully implemented, it could over-regulate a still-developing sector.”
Tanzania: Tax before rules
In contrast, Tanzania has adopted a tax-first approach, introducing a withholding tax on digital asset transactions without enacting a comprehensive regulatory framework. The Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) has moved to tax crypto-related income, emboldening some users who now view taxation as an unofficial endorsement.
However, legal experts caution that this approach may create uncertainty. Without a proper legal structure to define crypto assets, enforce contracts, or protect investors, Tanzania risks deterring larger players and failing to capitalize on crypto’s full potential.
“Taxing crypto without first regulating it is like selling fishing licenses without knowing where the lakes are,” said fintech consultant Joseph Mwakalinga. “It opens the door, but leaves too many questions unanswered.”
Read More: BoT set to release study on digital currencies
Uganda: Growing market, legal vacuum
Uganda presents a paradox. Despite its growing crypto adoption – especially among tech-savvy youth – the government has yet to provide formal legal recognition for digital assets.
Mobile money platforms have been barred from processing crypto transactions, and a recent High Court ruling denied cryptocurrencies any legal status.
This legal vacuum has resulted in a talent exodus, with blockchain developers, fund managers, and fintech entrepreneurs moving to more supportive environments like Kenya or Dubai.
Industry insiders are now urging Uganda to adopt a dual-regulator “twin-peaks” model, like South Africa’s, to separate oversight for financial stability and consumer protection.
Cross-border challenges
The fragmented regulatory environment is beginning to affect cross-border commerce and regional integration. Entrepreneurs in DeFi and remittances struggle to operate across East Africa due to conflicting rules, enforcement inconsistencies, and legal uncertainty.
“There’s a real need for regulatory harmonisation at the regional level,” said Rachel Odhiambo, a crypto policy analyst in Nairobi. “An East African digital asset framework would reduce compliance headaches, protect consumers, and encourage innovation. Without it, we risk turning a promising sector into a jurisdictional nightmare.”
A regional balancing act
The contrasting strategies reflect the broader challenge facing many developing nations: how to balance financial innovation with economic stability and consumer protection.
As East Africa continues to digitize its economy, the demand for secure, efficient, and accessible financial tools will only grow – and cryptocurrencies will be part of that mix. Whether governments choose to embrace or restrict them, one thing is clear: coordination, not isolation, will be key to unlocking the benefits of crypto in the region. Without a unified regional approach, East Africa’s crypto future remains uncertain – full of potential, yet vulnerable to policy fragmentation. As adoption rises, regulators must decide whether to compete, cooperate, or coordinate.
